Comparisons between nanoDot® dosimeters calibration methods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2021.v15.19849001638

Keywords:

dosimeters, calibration, Optically Stimulated Luminescence, radiation therapy

Abstract

Relative dosimeters are detectors that do not measure the absorbed dose directly, however, through a calibration process it is possible to relate the quantity measured to the dose. The nanoDot® dosimeters are relative dosimeters that work by optically stimulated luminescence process, therefore, the quantity measured in the readings of nanoDots®, that were exposed to radiation, is the number of photons emitted. The study aimed to compare three methodologies for nanoDot® dosimeters calibration and analyze two different adjustments (linear and polynomial) for the calibration. For this, different arrangements were used for the same set using a solid water simulator object, an Exradin A12 ionization chamber and the nanoDots® dosimeters. Two adjustments were applied to the calibration curves obtained for each methodology, a linear and a polynomial. In addition, the reproducibility of the measurements was calculated for methods B and C. The calibration factor obtained by the linear fit was (3,38 ± 0,08) x 10-3 cGy/counts, (3,51 ± 0,09) x 10-3 cGy/counts and (3,10 ± 0,04) x 10-3 cGy/counts for the methods A, B and C, respectively. The polynomial fit is the most adequate adjustment for the dosimeters calibration. The values obtained for the analysis of the reproducibility of the methodologies showed that the most reproducible was method C (2,29%), which is the most suitable for the calibration of nanoDots®.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Attix FH. Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry [Internet]. Madison, Wisconsin: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9783527617135
2. Musolino S V. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry Based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water; Technical Reports Series No. 398. 2001; Available from: http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nahu/DMRP/documents/CoP_V12_2006-06-05.pdf
3. Akselrod MS, Lucas AC, Polf JC, McKeever SWS. Optically stimulated luminescence of Al2O3. Radiat Meas. 1998;29(3–4):391–9.
4. Jursinic PA. Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements. Med Phys. 2007 Dec 1;34(12):4594–604.
5. Retna Ponmalar Y, Manickam R, Sathiyan S, Ganesh KM, Arun R, Godson HF. Response of nanodot optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters to therapeutic electron beams. J Med Phys [Internet]. 2017 Jan 1 [cited 2021 Mar 11];42(1):42–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28405107/
6. Nascimento LF, Saldarriaga C V., Vanhavere F, D’Agostino E, Defraene G, De Deene Y. Characterization of OSL Al2O3:C droplets for medical dosimetry. Radiat Meas [Internet]. 2013;56:200–4. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.01.048
7. Ponmalar R, Manickam R, Ganesh K, Saminathan S, Raman A, Godson H. Dosimetric characterization of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter with therapeutic photon beams for use in clinical radiotherapy measurements. J Cancer Res Ther [Internet]. 2017 Apr 1 [cited 2020 Sep 29];13(2):304. Available from: http://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2017/13/2/304/199432
8. Mrela I, Bokulić T, Izewska J, Budanec M, Fröbe A, Kusić Z. Optically stimulated luminescence in vivo dosimetry for radiotherapy: Physical characterization and clinical measurements in 60Co beams [Internet]. Vol. 56, Physics in Medicine and Biology. Phys Med Biol; 2011 [cited 2020 Nov 12]. p. 6065–82. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21873767/
9. Development of Procedures for In Vivo Dosimetry in Radiotherapy | IAEA [Internet]. [cited 2020 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/publications/8962/development-of-procedures-for-in-vivo-dosimetry-in-radiotherapy
10. (No Title) [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 11]. Available from: https://www.landauer.com/sites/default/files/2020-01/MICROSTAR ii USER MANUAL.pdf
11. Viamonte A, Da Rosa LAR, Buckley LA, Cherpak A, Cygler JE. Radiotherapy dosimetry using a commercial OSL system. Med Phys [Internet]. 2008 Mar 10 [cited 2020 Jun 3];35(4):1261–6. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1118/1.2841940
12. Schembri V, Heijmen BJM. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) of carbon-doped aluminum oxide (Al2 O3:C) for film dosimetry in radiotherapy. Med Phys [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2020 Nov 12];34(6):2113–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17654914/

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Silva Bertolli, P. H. ., & Camargo, A. V. de. (2021). Comparisons between nanoDot® dosimeters calibration methods. Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics, 15, 638. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2021.v15.19849001638

Issue

Section

Artigo Original