Study on the location of punctual breast density in different thicknesses of the compressed breast

Authors

  • CAMILA ENGLER Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear
  • Maria do Socorro Nogueira Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear
  • Danielle Soares Gomes Centro de Desenvolvimento da Tecnologia Nuclear

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2023.v17.19849001703

Keywords:

global breast density, punctual breast density, screening mammogram

Abstract

Breast density, defined as the percentage of fibroglandular tissue in the breast, has the potential to be used as a predictor of breast cancer risk. Recent studies indicate that the maximum punctual breast density, which is an underexplored measure and is a factor that has a greater link with breast cancer than the global breast density, the latter is the most used to measure the breast density. This study aims to identify whether the breast point density of 1cm2 of area is located in different regions of the breast in the different compressed breast thicknesses (CBT). In this retrospective study, mammographic images were analyzed in the medial-lateral oblique (MLO) and craniocaudal (CC) projections of 1192 women aged between 25 and 89 years and CBT between 30 and 89 mm. The information used was: CBT (mm), the distances from the posterior, superior and medial edges of the breast, (DPEB) (mm), (DSEB) (mm), and (DMEB) (mm), respectively, up to the location of the 1 cm2 of the maximum breast density punctual (MBDP), the volumetric density of the global breast (VDGB) (%), the MBDP (1 cm2) and the volume of the breast (cm3). The results of this study show that MBDP follows the same behavior as VDGB, in relation to the influence of CBT. Regarding the location of the MBDP, there is little evidence that CBT is a factor of strong influence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRAY, F.; FERLAY, J.; SOERJOMATARAM, I.; SIEGEL, R.L.; TORRE, L.A; JEMAL, A. Global cancer statistics. GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, Hoboken, V. 68, p. 394-424, 2018.

FERLAY, J.; ERVIK, M.; LAM, F.; COLOMBET, M.; MERY, L.; PIÑEROS, M.; ZNAOR, A.; SOERJOMATARAM, I.; BRAY, F. [online]. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France. (2018).

GØTZSCHE, P.C.; JORGENSEN, K.J. Screening for Breast Cancer with Mammography. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, v. 6, p. CD001877, 2013.

IARC - International Agency for Research on Cancer. Breast Cancer Screening. International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbooks of Cancer Prevention, .2016.

MCCORMACK, V.A.; DOS SANTOS SILVA, I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers, v. 15, p. 1159-69, 2006.

PEREIRA, S.M.P.; MCCORMACK, V.A.; HIPWELL, J.H.; RECORD, C.; WILKINSON, L.S.; MOSS, S.M.; HAWKES, D.J.; SILVA, I.S.; Localized Fibroglandular Tissue as a Predictor of Future Tumor Location within the Breast. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers. V. 20, p. 1718-25, 2011.

NAZARI, S. S.; MUKHERJEE, P. An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer. Breast Cancer, v. 25, n. 3, p. 259–267, 2018.

VINNICOMBE, S.J. Breast density: why all the fuss?. Clin. Radiol. V. 73, p. 334–357, 2017.

ALI, M.A.; CZENE, K.; ERIKSSON, L.; HALL, P.; HUMPHREYS, K. Breast tissue organization and its association with breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res., v. 19, p. 103, 2017.

HOLLAND, K.; GILS, C.H.V.; MANN, R.M.; KARSSEMEIJER, N. Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps. Breast Cancer Res Treat., v. 162, p. 541-548, 2017.

ZULFIQAR, M.; RAHMAH, M. Do the majority of Malaysian women have dense breasts on mammogram? Biomedical imaging and intervention journal, v. 7, p. e14, 2011.

ZOETELIEF, J.; VELDKAMP, W.J.H.; THIJSSEN, M.A.O.; JANSEN, J.T.M. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in The Netherlands. Phys Med Biol, v. 51, p. 1807–17, 2006

MOSHINA, N.; ROMAN, M.; WAADE, G.G.; SEBUODEGARD, S. Breast compression parameters and mammographic density in the Norwegian breast cancer screening programme. Eur Radiol., v. 28, p. 1662–72, 2018.

CONANT, E. F. et al. Five consecutive years of screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: Outcomes by screening year and round. Radiology, v. 295, n. 2, p. 285–293, 2020.

MOSHINA, N.; ROMAN, M.; WAADE, G.G.; SEBUODEGARD, S. Breast compression parameters and mammographic density in the Norwegian breast cancer screening programme. Eur Radiol., v. 28, p. 1662–72, 2018.

ZOETELIEF, J; VELDKAMP, W.J.H.; THIJSSEN, M.A.O.; JANSEN, J.T.M. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in The Netherlands. Phys Med Biol. v. 51, p.1807–17, 2006.

Published

2023-07-19

How to Cite

ENGLER, C., do Socorro Nogueira, M., & Soares Gomes, D. (2023). Study on the location of punctual breast density in different thicknesses of the compressed breast. Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics, 17, 703. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2023.v17.19849001703

Issue

Section

Artigo Original