Avaliação computacional da distribuição da energia depositada na região mamária durante mamografia de pacientes com implante de silicone

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2022.v16.19849001683

Keywords:

mammography, Monte Carlo simulation, dosimetry, MCNPX, silicone implant

Abstract

Mammography is essential for the prevention and diagnosis of breast cancer. In this study, a scenario of a mammographic examination was simulated, using the Monte Carlo method, in order to evaluate the dose distribution in the breasts of patients with silicone gel implant, in addition to investigating preliminarily whether the presence of the implant has a negative influence in the detection of mammographic findings. It was found that there is an increase in energy deposition in breasts that have a silicone implant, however, this increment occurred in the region of the prosthesis. Although no dose increase was observed in the breast tissue, the photon beam flow was significantly disturbed due to the presence of the implant, which could lead to a decrease in the quality of the radiographic images. In the preliminary evaluation with mammographic findings, tumor masses and microcalcifications were inserted, identifying a worsening on their visualization because of the silicone implant presence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bray F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, Hoboken, v. 68, n. 6, p. 394-424, Nov. 2018.

INCA/Ministério da Saúde. Estimativa 2020: incidência do câncer no Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva – Rio de Janeiro: 2019.

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Breast cancer screening. volume 15. Lion, 2016. disponível em: <https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Iarc-Handbooks-Of-Cancer-Prevention/Breast-Cancer-Screening-2016>. Acesso em 15 nov. 2021.

INCA/Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes para a detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil/ Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva – Rio de Janeiro: 2015.

Adami H, Hunter D, Trichopoulos, D. (Ed.). Textbook of cancer epidemiology. 2a. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Bernardes NB. et al. Câncer de mama x diagnóstico. Id on Line Rev. Mult. Psic.V.13, N. 44, p. 877-885, 2019 - ISSN 1981-1179.

ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. 2007.

Norma CNEN - NN. 3.01. Diretrizes básicas de proteção radiológica e respectivas posições regulatórias. 2014.

Eklund G. et al. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. American Journal of Roentgenology, 151(3), 469–473, 1988.

Couto LS, Freitas-Junior R, Correa RS, Peixoto JE. et al. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants. J Radiol Prot. 2019. 39(2):498-510.

Silva ACF, Santos JC. et al. Coeficientes de conversão do kerma no ar incidente para a dose glandular média em mamografia de mulheres com implantes mamários: estudo preliminar. Revista Brasileira de Física Médica. 2019; 13(2):25-29.

Massera RT, Tomal A. Mamografa digital: estudos dosimétricos e de qualidade da imagem por simulação monte carlo. Revista Brasileira de Física Médica. 2019;13(1):154-161.

Rogers DWO. Fifty years of Monte Carlo simulations for medical physics. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 51 (2006) R287–R301.

Yoriyaz, H. Método de Monte Carlo: princípios e aplicações em física médica. Artigo de revisão. Revista Brasileira de Física Médica. 2009;3(1):141-9.

Salehi, Z. et al. A review of the recent monte carlo (MC) simulation for dosimetry in mammographic applications. Mal J Med Health Sci 14(SUPP1): 76-81, Dec 2018.

Wu X, Barnes GT, Tucker DM. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-flm mammography. Radiology. 1991;179(1):143-8.

Pelowitz DB. MCNPX User’s Manual Version 2.7.0. Los Alamos, LANL, 2011.

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). Report 44: Tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry. Washington, 1989.

Oltulu P, Ince B, Kokbudak, N. Findik S, Kilinc F. Measurement of epidermis, dermis, and total skin thicknesses from six different body regions with a new ethical histometric technique. Turk J Plast Surg 2018;26:56-61.

Uushona, VN. The effect of silicone gel breast prosthesis on the electron beam dose distribution. Master dissertation. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, South Africa. 2009.

Massoud E, Nassef MH. Dose reduction during breast screening using monte carlo calculation. Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications, 50 (1), (232-238) 2017.

Viana RS, Yoriyaz H. NSECT applied to the assessment of calcium deposition due to the presence of microcalcifications associated with breast cancer. International Conference on Medical Physics, April 17-20, 2011, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Consatti KCW, Santos WS, Valença JVB, Yoshizumi MT. Study of different parameters in the simulation of diagnostic x-ray spectra using the mcnpx code. In: First Latin-American Congress on Solid Dosimetry and Radiation Measurements, 2021, Online Meeting. Proceedings Book. ISBN: 2319-0087. Availabre in: https://grupodoin.com/evento_1/abstract.htm.

Yoshimura EM. Física das radiações: interação da radiação com a matéria. Artigo de Revisão. Revista Brasileira de Física Médica. 2009;3(1):57-67.

Daskalaki A, Bliznakova K, Pallikarakis N. Evaluation of the effect of silicone breast inserts on X-ray mammography and breast tomosynthesis images: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Physica Medica, 2016

Shivaramu. Effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption and photon attenuation of tissues from human organs. Medical Dosimetry, V. 27, No. 1, 1–9, 2002.

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Wink Consatti, K. C., de Souza Santos, W., Batista Valença, J. V. ., & Yoshizumi, M. T. (2022). Avaliação computacional da distribuição da energia depositada na região mamária durante mamografia de pacientes com implante de silicone. Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics, 16, 683. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2022.v16.19849001683

Issue

Section

Artigo Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)