How many physicists do we need? A Brazilian point of view
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2021.v15.19849001585Palavras-chave:
medical physics, radiation therapy, staff calculation, full-time equivalence.Resumo
In Brazil the hiring of medical physics in radiation therapy (RT) departments is defined by regulatory agencies, considering only the number of patients treated. With the rise of new technologies, treatment techniques become more complex, requiring a greater amount of time and staff qualifications. International organizations solved this problem with a method for assessing personnel levels and determining the quantity of professionals required for a specific RT department. In this work, we adapted this strategy to our clinical reality and derived calculations of the time per task multiplied by the expected number of tasks. The task requirements were described in detail and the amounts of time required to perform each task over a one-year period were determined. The sum of task times were related to a suitable full-time equivalence (FTE), considering a team only of medical physicists. We thus determined that our clinic should have 11 FTE personnel, evidencing a need for hiring. The use of a personnel justification grid enables the demonstration of professional staffing insufficiencies in clinics, a condition that hinders the development of RT departments, including the scope of teaching and research.
Downloads
Referências
Comissão Nacional de Segurança Nuclear. Requisitos de Segurança e Proteção Radiológica para Serviços de Radioterapia 2017.
http://appasp.cnen.gov.br/seguranca/normas/pdf/Nrm610.pdf
Ministério da Saúde. Resolução-RDC Nº 20 2006. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2006/rdc0020_02_02_2006.html
Ford EC, Fong de Los Santos L, Pawlicki T, Sutlief S, Dunscombe P. Consensus recommendations for incident learning database structures in radiation oncology. Med Phys. 2012; 39(12):7272-90.
Mills MD. Analysis and practical use: the abt study of medical physicist work values for radiation oncology physics services – round II. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005; 2(9):782-9.
Mills MD, Spanos WJ, Jose BO, Kelly BA, Brill JP. Preparing a cost analysis for the section of medical physics-guidelines and methods. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2000; 1(2):76-85.
Eudaldo T, Huizenga H, Lamm IL, et al. Guidelines for education and training of medical physicists in radiotherapy. Recommendations from an ESTRO/EFOMP working group. Radiother Oncol. 2004; 70(2):125-35.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Human Health Campus 2015
Accessed March 9, 2020.
Klein EE. A grid to facilitate physics staffing justification. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010; 11(1):2987.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Karina Waiswol Boccaletti, Adriana Aparecida Flosi, Ana Paula Vollet Cunha, Cassio de Queiroz Tannous, Jeam Haroldo Oliveira, Amanda Burg Rech
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A submissão de artigos originais para a Revista Brasileira de Física Médica implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação impressa e digital. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Em virtude de sermos um periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais, científicas, não comerciais, desde que citada a fonte.
A Revista Brasileira de Física Médica está sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
