Otimização na Avaliação de Doses em TC usando Dosímetros OSL em forma de Fita

Optimization in Dose Assessment in CT using Tape-shaped OSL Dosimeters

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2021.v15.19849001615

Keywords:

tomografia computadorizada, perfis de dose, fitas OSL, câmara de ionização, CTDI, dose de equilíbrio

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) images contribute to high-quality medical diagnosis, but radiation dose can be quite high requiring accurate assessment. The CT dose index (CTDI) was developed in the 80s for dosimetric purposes, but for scanners operated exclusively in axial mode. CTDI tends to underestimate patient dose in helical CT exams. AAPM report TG111 (2010) suggested a new metric in which the patient's radiation dose is obtained from dose profiles constructed from several measurements made with a small ionization chamber. It is also possible to obtain the dose distribution profiles using properly calibrated OSL (optically stimulated luminescence) tapes. In this work, a Radcal ionization (“pencil”) chamber and OSL Landauer (LuxelTM) tapes 20 cm long and 0.3 cm wide were X-ray-irradiated, in air and in the holes of two cylindrical CT phantoms, using three peak voltage values (100, 120, 140 kV), both in lab and in a clinical CT scanner. Irradiated tapes were read using an OSL reader built in the GDRFM. The OSL profiles were calibrated against ion chamber, matching the CTDI100 values obtained from both detectors. After this, CTDIw and CTDIvol values were determined from the calibrated profiles. CTDI values from OSL profiles differed approximately 3.9% related to those from the CT scanner. From the profiles, also the planar equilibrium dose Deq,p (TG111) was evaluated in some CT protocols; this quantity exceeded the CTDI values provided by the CT scanner in all the cases. E.g.: The percentage difference found between Deq,p and CTDIvol for the head phantom ranged between 33-25%. Thus, in some cases, it could be advantageous to use calibrated OSL dosimeters instead of an ionization chamber to obtain the profiles, because the optimization in the measuring time (it is possible to obtain five OSL profiles from a single phantom irradiation).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Johnatan Dias de Oliveira, Universidade Federal do ABC

Aluno do curso de Engenharia Biomédica da Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)

Elisabeth Mateus Yoshimura, Instituto de Física/Universidade de São Paulo

Bacharelado Em Física pela Universidade de São Paulo, mestrado e doutorado em Física pela Universidade de São Paulo. Atualmente é professor titular da Universidade de São Paulo. Tem experiência na área de Física, com ênfase em Física da Radiação, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: dosimetria da radiação aplicada a radiologia, radioterapia e meio ambiente; termoluminescência e luminescência opticamente estimulada; proteção radiológica e dosimetria de lasers de baixa intensidade aplicados à saúde. É consultora ad-hoc para várias revistas científicas, FAPESP e CNPq.

Ricardo Andrade Terini, Instituto de Física - Universidade de São Paulo

Grande área: Ciências Exatas e da Terra / Área: Física / Subárea: Física Médica/Especialidade: Metrologia em Física Médica.
Grande área: Ciências Exatas e da Terra / Área: Física / Subárea: Ensino de Física.
Grande área: Ciências Exatas e da Terra / Área: Física / Subárea: física Mèdica, Instrumentação Nuclear Aplicada a Radiodiagnóstico.
Grande área: Ciências Exatas e da Terra / Área: Física / Subárea: Física Médica/Especialidade: Ensino de Física Médica.

References

1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR 2008 Report, vol. I, Annex A: Medical Radiation Exposures, NY, 2010. Available from: https://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2008/UNSCEAR_2008_Report_Vol.I-CORR.pdf
2. Campelo MCS, Silva MC, Terini RA. CTDI versus New AAPM Metrics to assess Doses in CT: a case study. Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences 2016; 04-02:01-15. Available from: https://www.bjrs.org.br/revista/index.php/REVISTA/article/view/194
3. Giansante L, Santos JC, Umisedo NK, Terini RA, Costa PR. Characterization of OSL dosimeters for use in dose assessment in Computed Tomography procedures. Physica Medica 2018; 47:16-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.02.009.
4. Ruan C, Yukihara EG, Couse WJ et al. Determination of multislice computed tomography dose index (CTDI) using optically stimulated luminescence technology. Medical Physics 2010; 37(7):3560-3568. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3455285
5. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of radiation dose in X-ray computed tomography. Report of AAPM Task Group 111. College Park, MD: AAPM, 2010. Available from: https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_111.pdf
6. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Dosimetry in Radiology: An International Code of Practice, Technical Reports Series n° 457. Vienna, 2007. Available from: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/TRS457_web.pdf .
7. Yukihara EG, Ruan C, Gasparian PBR et al. An optically stimulated luminescence system to measure dose profiles in x-ray computed tomography, Phys. Med. Biol. 2009; 54: 6337–6352. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/20/020 .
8. Umisedo NK, Yoshimura EM. POSLI – Instrumentação para leitura de detetores OSL em forma de fita. Grupo de Dosimetria das Radiações e Física Médica – Instituto de Física da Universidade de São Paulo, 2013.
9. Li X, Zhang D, and Liu B. Calculations of two new dose metrics proposed by AAPM Task Group 111 using the measurements with standard CT dosimetry phantoms. Medical Physics 2013; 40, 081914 (2013). doi: 10.1118/1.4813899.

Published

2021-11-01

How to Cite

Dias de Oliveira, J., Mateus Yoshimura, E., & Andrade Terini, R. . (2021). Otimização na Avaliação de Doses em TC usando Dosímetros OSL em forma de Fita: Optimization in Dose Assessment in CT using Tape-shaped OSL Dosimeters. Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics, 15, 615. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2021.v15.19849001615

Issue

Section

Artigo Original