Effective Doses and Dose Reference Levels (DRLs) in a radiology department from a tertiary hospital

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2022.v16.19849001678

Keywords:

dose, x ray, radiology, radiodiagnosis, radioprotection

Abstract

One way to promote optimization in radiation protection is by implementing the concept of the Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL). There are several ways to estimate the radiation dose delivered to the patient, including the dose-area product (DAP) estimate. This study estimated diagnostic reference levels for common radiographic examinations performed in a large Brazilian hospital. For this, DAP data were collected and filtered for the standard patient model. All procedures evaluated were performed in conventional radiology equipment, including AP chest, LAT chest and PA chest, AP abdomen, AP pelvis and AP and LAT lumbar spine. The PCXMC 2.0 software was used in the computer simulation of radiographic exams to simulate the effective dose in the patient for the incidences used. In total, after checking the data, 167 DAP values were selected and the number of incidences performed ranged from 7 to 51 for different projections. The highest number of incidences were collected for the LAT thorax and the lowest number of incidences for the LAT lumbar spine. The 1st quartile, median and 3rd quartile were analyzed, as well as minimum and maximum DBH and the interquartile value (IQV) for each data set. The computer simulations resulted in effective dose values compatible with the international literature. As this is an initial work to survey the DRL, some points must be taken into account: the service is part of a teaching hospital with professionals in training; there are technical charts available. However, the digital equipment was recently installed; the study must be in-depth, with a greater number of each incidence, so that the protocols are well established in the service. This study serves as a reference for other services that wish to survey the diagnostic reference level for conventional radiology protocols.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amis ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM, et al. American College of Radiology White Paper on Radiation Dose in Medicine. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2007; 4(5):272–84.

International Atomic Energy Agency (Vienna). Implementation Of The International Code Of Practice On Dosimetry In Diagnostic Radiology (TRS 457): Review of Test Results. IAEA human health series N. 4., 2011.

International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4), 2007.

Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear (Brasil). Norma CNEN NN 3.01 – Diretrizes Básicas De Proteção Radiológica, Resolução 164/14. Publicado em: março/2014.

Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog. Radiology. 2008; 248(1):254–63.

Metaxas VI, Messaris GA, Lekatou AN, Petsas TG, Panayiotakis GS. Patient dose in digital radiography utilising bmi classification. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2018; 184(2):155–67.

Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, et al. ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Annals of the ICRP. 2017; 46(1):1–144.

Tapiovaara M. PCXMC 2.0 Supplementary programs user’s guide. STUK, 2012.

Servomaa A, Tapiovaara M. Organ Dose Calculation in Medical X Ray Examinations by the Program PCXMC. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1998; 80(1):213–9.

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brasil). Resolução Diretoria Colegiada nº 330, de 20 de dezembro de 2019, Diário Oficial da União, Edição: 249, Seção: 1, Página: 92, Publicado em:26/12/2019.

Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Brasil). Instrução normativa - in nº 90, de 27 de maio de 2021, Diário Oficial da União, Edição: 101, Seção: 1, Página: 149, Publicado em:31/05/2021.

Wachabauer D, Röthlin F, Moshammer HM, Homolka P. Diagnostic Reference Levels for conventional radiography and fluoroscopy in Austria: Results and updated National Diagnostic Reference Levels derived from a nationwide survey. European Journal of Radiology [Internet]. 2019; 113:135–9.

Tsapaki V. Radiation dose optimization in diagnostic and interventional radiology: Current issues and future perspectives. Physica Medica. 2020; 79:16–21.

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Alvarez, M., Milani, A. L. ., Souza, S. P., Marques, T. G. S., Silva, M. A. A. ., Guassu, R. A. C. ., Bucci, J. ., Matsuki, G. B., Pina, D. R. de, & Alves, A. F. F. . (2022). Effective Doses and Dose Reference Levels (DRLs) in a radiology department from a tertiary hospital. Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics, 16, 678. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2022.v16.19849001678

Issue

Section

Artigo Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)