Monte Carlo simulation of conversion coefficients for dosimetry in mammography

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2022.v16.19849001693

Keywords:

Dosimetry, Mammography, Monte Carlo simulation, Conversion coefficients

Abstract

The mean glandular dose (MGD) is considered the most adequate dosimetric quantity to assess the risks associated with mammography, since glandular tissue is the most radiosensitive one. However, the MGD cannot be measured directly due to the heterogeneous distribution of breast tissues. The well-established method for determine this quantity is based on the product of incident air kerma (Kair) in the breast by conversion coefficients, called normalized glandular dose (DgN) and calculated by the Monte Carlo (MC) method. However, the DgN coefficients have a wide variation with the characteristics of the breast and the incident spectrum, leading to the necessity of using complex tables. In this work, the correlation between MGD and other dosimetric quantities (mean dose in the whole breast, mean dose in the skin and mean dose in the homogeneous tissue) was studied, using the code MC PENELOPE (v. 2018) + PenEasy (v. 2020), in order to determine new conversion coefficients in mammography. The results of this study showed that, in the energy range of interest in mammography (15-25 keV), the new conversion coefficients obtained from mean dose measurements in the whole breast or in the homogeneous tissue are approximately constant for each breast characteristic, while the new conversion coefficients of the mean dose measured in the skin showed a high variability in this range. Thus, these conversion coefficients may be useful for estimating the MGD from the experimental dose assessment based on dose distribution in phantoms, and can be used as an alternative/complementary to the DgN coefficients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Estimativa 2020: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2019.

Ferlay J. et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. International Journal of Cancer. 2021;149(4): 178-789.

World Health Organization. Guide to Cancer Early Diagnosis. Geneva; World Health Organization, 2014.

Dance DR. and Sechopoulos I. Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2016;61(19): R271-304.

Dance DR., Skinner CL. and Carlsson GA. Breast dosimetry. Applied Radiation and isotopes. 1999;50(1): 185-203.

Boone JM. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy x-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. Radiology. 1999;213(1): 23-37.

Wu X., Gingold EL., Barnes GT. and Tucker DM. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography. Radiology. 1994;193(1): 83-89.

Salvat F. PENELOPE-2018: A code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. Workshop Proceedings. Barcelona, Spain, 2019.

Sempau J., Badal A. and Brualla, L. A PENELOPE‐based system for the automated Monte Carlo simulation of clinacs and voxelized geometries-application to far‐from‐axis fields. Medical physics. 2011;38(11): 5887-5895.

Massera RT. and Tomal, A. Mamografia Digital: estudos dosimétricos e de qualidade da imagem por simulação Monte Carlo. Revista Brasileira de Física Médica. 2019;13(1): 154 161.

Hammerstein GR., Miller DW., White DR., Masterson ME., Woodard HQ. and Laughlin JS. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. Radiology, 1979;130(2), 485-491.

Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM. Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z= 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest. National Inst. of Standards and Technology-PL, Gaithersburg, MD (United States). Ionizing Radiation Div., 1995.

Hernandez AM., Seibert JA., Nosratieh A. and Boone JM. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x‐ray spectra. Medical physics, 2017; 44(6), 2148-2160.

Routine to calculate the Half Value Layer (HVL), effective energy and average energy of a spectrum. 2022 [cited 2022 March 11]. Available from: https://github.com/gfrmd-ifgw/hvl_calculator

Published

2022-12-13

How to Cite

Tayna Dantas Rodrigues, A., Trevisan Massera , R., & Tomal , A. . (2022). Monte Carlo simulation of conversion coefficients for dosimetry in mammography. Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics, 16, 693. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2022.v16.19849001693

Issue

Section

Artigo Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)