GT 2301: Documento Técnico de Radiocirurgia Brasileiro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2023.v17.19849001738Palavras-chave:
radioterapia de precisão, hipofracionamento, radioterapia funcional, radiocirurgia estereotáxicaResumo
O Documento Técnico de Radiocirurgia Brasileiro é um projeto da Associação Brasileira de Física Médica (ABFM) idealizado pela diretoria de Radioterapia na gestão 2022/2023 em parceria com Físicos Médicos Especialistas e Médicos especialistas em Radiocirurgia.Trata-se de um documento técnico, visando o consenso dos parâmetros e requisitos mínimos para realização de Radiocirugia, considerando a heterogeneidade dos recursos técnicos e humanos disponíveis no atual cenário brasileiro.Tivemos a participação de 16 membros no projeto, todos com experiências prévias em Radiocirurgia durante sua formação e/ou nas práticas técnicas e clínicas nas instituições que atuam. Utilizamos a Metodologia Delphi para aprovação do documento. A Técnica Delphi consiste na construção de consenso de opiniões de um grupo de especialistas, com o objetivo de avaliar determinado problema ou proposta de uma solução. A aprovação do documento pelo grupo, consistiu em avaliar com notas de 1 a 5 em que: 1 define-se como pouco satisfeito e 5 muito satisfeito. Os 16 membros avaliaram quatro fatores que caracterizaram o projeto que foram: os membros participantes do projeto, distri- buição dos membros nos capítulos, divisão dos capítulos e aprovação final do documento) obtivemos para todas as quatro avaliações pelo menos 82% dos membros avaliando com a nota 5, muito satisfeito.
Downloads
Referências
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Plan- ning Dose Calculations - Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v. 17, p. 457 –, 2 2016.
ADJEIWAAH, M. Quality Assurance for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Radi- otherapy. 2019. 75 p. Tese (Doutorado) — UMEA University.
ADLER, J. R. J. et al. The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic radiosurgery. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Lyon, v. 1, n. 1, p. 124 – 128, January 1997.
AGAZIRYAN, N. et al. Intra-fraction motion management for radiosurgical treatments of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical experience, imaging frequence, and motion analysis. Cureus - Open aricles, v. 13, n. 4, p. 2 – 7, 4 2021.
AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNCIA SANITÁRIA. RESOLUÇÃO DA DIRETORIA COLEGI- ADA - RDC Nº 20. RESOLUÇÃO DA DIRETORIA COLEGIADA - RDC Nº 20, 2006. Disponí-
vel em: https://www:cevs:rs:gov:br/upload/arquivos/201611/01172122-20120418113323rdc-
-2006-diretrizes-servicos-de-radioterapia:pdf.
AGENCY, I. A. E. Commissioning and Quality Assurance of Computerized Planning Systems for Radiation Treatment of Cancer: Technical Reports SeriEs No.430. VIENNA: IAEA, 2004.
AL-HALLAQ, H. A. et al. AAPM task group report 302: Surface-guided radiotherapy. Medical physics, v. 49, p. e82 – e112, 2 2022.
ALAEI, P.; HIGGINS, P. D.; GERBI, B. J. In vivo diode dosimetry for IMRT treatments generated by Pinnacle treatment planning system. Medical Dosimetry, p. 26 – 29, 2009. Disponível em: doi:org/10:1016/j:meddos:2008:01:002.
ALFONSO, R. et al. A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields. Medical Physics 2008;35(11):5179-86, v. 35, n. 11, p. 5179 – 5186, Nov 2008.
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS STAFF. Annual Book of ASTM
Standards 1990. [S.l.: s.n.], 1990.
ARP, D. T.; CARL, J. EXACTRAC x-ray and beam isocenters - What’s the difference? Medical Physics, v. 39, n. 3, p. 1418 – 1423, February 2012.
ASGARI; BANAEE, N.; NEDAIE, H. A. Comparison of full width at half maximum and pe- numbra of different Gamma Knife models. Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, v. 14, n. 2, p. 260 – 266, MAR 2018.
ASMERON, G. et al. The design and physical characterization of a multileaf collimator for robotic radiosurgery. Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express, v. 2, n. 017003, p. 1
– 13, January 2016. Disponível em: doi:10:1088/2057-1976/2/1/017003.
ASP, L. et al. The Role of a Physicist in Radiation Oncology: AAPM Report No. 38. [S.l.], 1993.
ASPRADAKIS, M. et al. Small field MV photon dosimetry. IPEM Report No. 103. 2010.
ASTRO’S MULTIDISCIPLINARY QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMITTEE. Safety is No Acci-
dent: A Framework for Quality Radiation Oncology Care. March 2019.
ATWOOD, T. F. et al. Establishing a New Clinical Role for Medical Physicists: A Prospective Phase II Trial. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys, v. 102, n. 3, p. 635 – 641, 2018.
AZANGWE, G. Detector to detector corrections: A comprehensive experimental study of detector specific correction factors for beam output measurements for small radiotherapy beams. Medical Physics, v. 41, n. 7, p. 072103 – –, June 2014.
BABIC, S. et al. o frame or not to frame? Cone-beam CT-based analysis of head immobiliza- tion devices specific to linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy. Journal of Applied to Cninical Medical Physics, v. 19, n. 2, p. 111 – 120, Março 2018a.
BABIC, S. et al. o frame or not to frame? Cone-beam CT-based analysis of head immobiliza- tion devices specific to linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy. Journal of Applied to Cninical Medical Physics, v. 19, n. 2, p. 111 – 120, Março 2018b.
BADAKHSHI, H. et al. Image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery for cranial lesions: large margins compensate for reduced image guidance frequency. Anticancer research, v. 33, p. 4639 – 43, 10 2013.
BALDOCK, C. et al. Topical Review: Polymer gel dosimetry. Physics in medicine and biology, v. 55, n. 5, p. R1 – R63, 2 2010. ISSN 0031-9155. Disponível em: https:
//www:ncbi:nlm:nih:gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031873/.
BARNES, M. et al. A retrospective analysis of setup and intrafraction positional variation in stereotactic radiotherapy treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys, p. 1 – 11, 9 2020.
BASRAN, P.; YEBOAH, C. Dosimetric verification of micro-MLC based intensity modulated radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys, v. 23, n. 9, p. 109 – 121, 06 2008.
BATTISTONI, G. et al. FLUKA Monte Carlo simulation for the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery system: homogeneous media. Physica Medica, p. 1 – 6, July 2012.
BAUMERT, B. G. et al. Repositioning accuracy of fractionated stereotactic irradiation: asses- sment of isocentre alignment for different dental fixations by using sequential CT scanning. Radiotherapy and Oncology, v. 74, n. 1, p. 61 – 66, Janeiro 2005.
BENEDICT, S. H. et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Medical physics, v. 37, p. 4078 – 101, 10 2010.
BENMAKHLOUF, H.; SEMPAU, J.; ANDREO, P. Output correction factors for nine small field detectors in 6 MV radiation therapy photon beams: A PENELOPE Monte Carlo study. Medical Physics, v. 41, n. 4, p. 041711 – –, Apr 2014.
BENNION, N. R.; T, M.; V, V. A comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes between frame-based and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. Pract Radiat Oncol., v. 6, n. 6, p. e283 – e290, 2016.
BERNETT, G. H. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery—an organized neurosurgery- sanctioned definition. J Neurosurg, v. 106, p. 1 – 5, January 2007.
BHATNAGAR, J. P. et al. Measurement of relative output factors for the 8 and 4 mm collimators of Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion by film dosimetry. v. 36, n. 5, p. 1768 – 1774, April 2009.
BISSONNETTE, J. et al. Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: A report of the AAPM TG-179. Medical Physics, v. 39, n. 4, p. 1946
– 1963, March 2012.
BOMAN, E. et al. Treatment accuracy without rotational setup corrections in intracranial SRT.
Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v. 17, p. 86 – 94, 7 2016.
BORTFELD, T. et al. Image-Guided IMRT. 1. ed. [S.l.]: Springer, 2005. 460 p. ISBN 354020511X.
BORZOV, E. et al. Dosimetric characterization of Elekta stereotactic cones. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v. 19, n. 1, p. 194 – 203, Janeiro 2018.
BRASIL MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE. Instrução normativa: nº97. Instrução normativa nº97, 2021.
BROCK et al. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. n. 76, p. 44 – 43, 08 2017a.
BROCK, K. K. et al. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. n. 76, p. 44 – 43, 08 2017b.
BRUNT, J. N. H. Computed tomography-magnetic resonance image registration in radi- otherapy treatment planning. Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), v. 22, n. 8, p. 688 – 97, Oct 2010.
CHAIRMAN, R. L. D. et al. Comprehensive Methodology for the Evaluation of Radiation Dose in X-Ray Computed Tomography. AAPM, 2010.
CHANG, J. A statistical model for analyzing the rotational error of single isocenter for multiple targets technique. Medical physics, v. 44, p. 2115 – 2123, 4 2017.
CHANG, J. Incorporating the rotational setup uncertainty into the planning target volume margin expansion for the single isocenter for multiple targets technique. Practical radiation oncology, v. 8, p. 475 – 483, 7 2018.
CHANG, Z. et al. maging system QA of a medical accelerator, Novalis Tx, for IGRT per TG 142: our 1 year experience. J Appl Clin Med Phys . 2012 Jul 5;13(4):3754. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3754., v. 13, n. 4, p. 113 – 140, Julho 2012.
CHAO, S. T. et al. ACR-ASTRO Practice Parameter for the Performance of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. American journal of clinical oncology, v. 43, p. 545 – 552, 5 2020.
CHAPPELL, P. M. et al. Comparison of lesion enhancement on spin-echo and gradient-echo images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, v. 15, n. 1, p. 37 – 44, Jan 1994.
CHEN, A. Y. et al. Frame and frameless linear accelerator-based radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. J Radiosurg SBRT, v. 3, n. 4, p. 259 – 270, 2015.
CHOW, J. C.; SEGUIN, M.; ALEXANDER, A. Dosimetric effect of collimating jaws for small multileaf collimated fields. Medical Physics, v. 32, n. 3, p. 759 – 765, March 2005.
CLARK, G. M. et al. Plan quality and treatment planning technique for single isocenter cranial radiosurgery with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Practical radiation oncology, v. 2, p. 306 – 313, 3 2014.
CLARK, G. M. et al. Feasibility of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple brain metastases. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 76, p. 296 – 302, 10 2009.
CNEN. NN 6.10 - Requisitos de Segurança e Proteção Radiológica para Serviços de Radioterapia. 12 2014. Disponível em: http://appasp:cnen:gov:br/seguranca/normas/pdf/ Nrm610:pdf.
DAS, I. J. Report of AAPM Task Group 155: Megavoltage photon beam dosimetry in small fields and non-equilibrium conditions. Medical physics, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi:org/ 10:1002/mp:15030.
DAS, I. J. et al. A quality assurance phantom for electronic portal imaging devices. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v. 12, n. 2, p. 391 – 403, dezembro 2010.
DAS, I. J. et al. Quality and Safety Considerations in Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereo- tactic Body Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO Safety White Paper Update. Practical Radiation Oncology, v. 12, n. 4, p. e253 – e268, July-August 2022.
DAS, I. J.; DING, G.; AHNESJÖ, A. Small fields: Nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. v. 35, n. 1, p. 206 – 215, Jan 2008.
DERREUMAUX, S. et al. Lessons from recent accidents in radiation therapy in France.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, v. 131, n. 1, p. 130 – 135, 2008.
DIETERICH et A. S. Report of AAPM TG 135: Quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery.
Medical physics, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi:org/10:1118/1:3579139.
DIETERICH, S.; FORD, E.; HALASZ, C. MO-D-BRB-07: Failure-Mode and Effects Analysis Study for CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery. In: MEDICINE, A. A. of Physicists in (Ed.). Fifty-fourth annual meeting of the american association of physicists in medicine. [S.l.], 2012. v. 39, p. 3867 – 3867.
DIETRICH, S. et al. Report of AAPM TG 135: Quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery.
Medical Physics, v. 38, n. 6, p. 2914 – 2936, June 2011.
DONALD, R. L. M. et al. Real-Time Infrared Motion Tracking Analysis for Patients Treated With Gated Frameless Image Guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, v. 106, n. 2, p. 413 – 421, Fevereiro 2020.
DYK, J. V. et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys, v. 26, p. 261 – 273, 1993.
ECHNER, G. G. et al. The design, physical properties and clinical utility of an iris collimator for robotic radiosurgery. Physics in Medicine and Biology, IOP Publishing, v. 1, n. 54, p. 5359 – 5380, August 2009. Disponível em: doi:10:1088/0031-9155/54/18/001.
EKLUND, K. Modeling silicon diode dose response in radiotherapy fields using fluence pencil kernels. 2010. - p. Tese (Doutorado) — Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala Universitet.
ELAWADI, A. A. et al. The Effect of Contrast Agents on Dose Calculations of Volumetric Mo- dulated Arc Radiotherapy Plans for Critical Structures. Applied Sciences, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi:org/10:3390/app11188355.
ELEKTA. A new TMR dose algorithm in Leksell Gamma Plan. Kungstensgata: [s.n.], 2011.
ELSON, A. et al. Use of helical TomoTherapy for the focal hypofractionated treatment of limited brain metastases in the initial and recurrent setting. Frontiers Oncology, v. 27, n. 5,
p. 0 – 0, January 2015.
EZZELL, G. A. The spatial accuracy of two frameless, linear accelerator-based systems for single-isocenter, multitarget cranial radiosurgery. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v. 18, p. 37 – 43, 3 2017.
FAN, Q. et al. A Quality Assurance Approach for Linear Accelerator Mechanical Isocenters with Portal Images. Inernational Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, v. 7, p. 100 – 114, February 2018.
FLICKINGER, J. C. et al. Dose selection in stereotactic radiosurgery. Prog Neurol Surg, v. 20, n. 1, p. 28 – 42, 02 2007.
FLICKINGER, J. C. et al. Development of a model to predict permanent symptomatic postradiosurgery injury for arteriovenous malformation patients. Arteriovenous Malformation Radiosurgery Study Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, v. 46, n. 5, p. 1143 – 1148, 03 2000.
FLICKINGER, J. C. et al. Dose selection in stereotactic radiosurgery. Prog Neurol Surg, v. 27, n. 11, p. 49 – 57, 12 2013.
FLICKINGER, J. C. et al. Development of a model to predict permanent symptomatic postradiosurgery injury for arteriovenous malformation patients. Arteriovenous Malformation Radiosurgery Study Group. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 46, p. 1143 – 8, 3 2000.
FOG, L. S. et al. A closer look at RapidArc® radiosurgery plans using very small fields.
Physics in Medicine & Biology, v. 56, n. 6, p. 1853 – 1863, Março 2011.
FOSTES, R. SRS/SBRT Errors and Causes. In: AAPM Summer School. [s.n.], 2014. p. 1 –
Disponível em: https://www:aapm:org/meetings/2014SS/documents/03Tuesday1030- AAPMSummerSchool2014SafetyandQApresentationRDFFinal_REVISED-rx:pdf. Acesso em: 06/07/2022.
FRAASS, B. et al. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Com- mittee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Medical physics, v. 25, p. 1773 – 829, 11 1998.
FURNARI, L. et al. (org.). Controle da Qualidade em Radioterapia. São Paulo: Crayon Editorial, 2021. ISBN 978-85-66727-01-2.
GANESHKUMAR, P. et al. Plan evaluation indices: A journey of evolution. Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, v. 25, p. 336 – 344, 3 2020.
GEVAERT, T. et al. Clinical Evaluation of a Robotic 6-Degree of Freedom Treatment Couch for Frameless Radiosurgery. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, v. 83, n. 1, p. 467 – 474, Maio 2012.
GIBBONS, J. P. et al. Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71. Medical Physics, v. 41, n. 3, 2014. Disponível em: https://aapm:onlinelibrary:wiley:com/doi/abs/10:1118/1:4864244.
GILLER, C. A. et al. Radiosurgical Planning: Gamma Knife Tricks and Cyber Picks. 1. ed. [S.l.]: Wiley-Blackwell, July/2009. 200 p. ISBN 0470175567.
GLEIDE-HURST, C. K. et al. Report No. 284 - AAPM Task Group 284: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Simulation in Radiotherapy: Considerations for Clinical Implementation, Optimiza- tion, and Quality Assurance. [S.l.], 2021. Disponível em: https://doi:org/10:1002/mp:14695.
GOURMELON, P. et al. The French radiation accident experience: emerging concepts in radiation burn and ARS therapies and in brain radiopathology. In: 36th annual meeting of the European Radiation Research Society. [S.l.: s.n.], 2008. v. 43, n. 5, p. 1 – 4.
GOYAL, S.; KATARIA, T. Image Guidance in Radiation Therapy: Techniques and Applications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation - Radiology Research and Practice, p. 1 – 11, December 2014.
GRAFFEO, C. S. et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arterio- venous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline. Neurosurgery, v. 87, n. 3, p. 442 – 452, 09 2020.
GRIMM, J. et al. High Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC): An Overview. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 110, p. 1 – 10, 4 2021.
GROPPO, D.; SARAIVA, C. W. C.; CALDAS, L. V. E. Determination of the penumbra width of Elekta SRS cone collimator for 6MV FF and 6MV FFF energies using gradient-based edge detection. Radiation Physics and Chemistry Volume 167, February 2020, 108319, v. 167,
n. 108319, p. 1 – 5, Fevereiro 2020.
GUCKENBERGER, M. et al. Reliability of the bony anatomy in image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 69, n. 1, p. 294 – 301, 09 2007.
GUCKENBERGER, M. et al. Definition and quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgenge- sellschaft ... [et al], v. 196, p. 417 – 420, 3 2020.
GUCKENBERGER, M. et al. Dosimetric consequences of translational and rotational errors in frame-less image-guided radiosurgery. Radiation Oncology, v. 7, n. 63, p. 1 – 8, Abril 2012.
GUCKENBRGER, M. et al. Definition and quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol, v. 196, n. 5, p. 417 – 420, 05 2020.
GUCKENGERGER, M. et al. Precision of Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) in Six Degrees of Freedom and Limitations in Clinical Practice. Strahlentherapie und Oncologie, v. 183, n. 6, p. 307 – 313, June 2007.
GUCKENGRGER, M. et al. Definition and quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgenge- sellschaft ... [et al], v. 196, p. 417 – 420, 3 2020.
HALVORSEN, P. H. et al. AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.a. for SRS-SBRT.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, v. 18, n. 5, p. 10 – 21, 2017a.
HALVORSEN, P. H. et al. AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.a. for SRS-SBRT.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, v. 18, n. 5, p. 10 – 21, 2017b.
HANSEN, C. R. et al. Contouring and dose calculation in head and neck cancer radiotherapy after reduction of metal artifacts in CT images. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017. Disponível em: https://pubmed:ncbi:nlm:nih:gov/28464749/.
HE, D. C. et al. Positioning error analysis of the fraxion localization system in the intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of tumors. Clinical and Translational Oncology, v. 23, n. 1, p. 43
– 47, Janeiro 2021.
HERK, M. van. Errors and Margins in Radiotherapy. Seminars in Radiation Oncology, v. 14, n. 1, p. 52 – 64, Janeiro 2004.
HERMAN, M. G. et al. Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. Med. Phys. 28 5, May 2001, v. 28, n. 5, p. 712 – 737, 5
HIGGINS, P. D. Monitor unit checking in heterogeneous stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment planning. Medical Dosimetry, v. 36, p. 255 – 263, 2011. Disponível em: doi:org/ 10:1016/j:meddos:2010:04:003.
HONG, L. et al. Experience of micromultileaf collimator linear accelerator based single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: tumor dose inhomogeneity, conformity, and dose fall off. Medical physics, v. 38, p. 1239 – 47, 4 2011.
HUG, M. S. et al. The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management. Medical Physics, v. 43, n. 7, p. 4209 – 4262, July 2016.
HUR, B. I. et al. Validation of Gamma Knife Perfexion Dose Profile Distribution by a Modified Variable Ellipsoid Modeling Technique. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, v. 64, n. 1, p. 13 – 22, January 2021.
IAEA. IAEA TRS-398. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. 2006.
IAEA; AAPM. IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA. Technical reports series No. 483 (TRS-483). Dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy. An International code of practice for Reference and Relative Dose Determination. 2017.
IAEA - HHR 16. Introduction of Image Guided Radiotherapy into Clinical Practice. VIENA: IAEA, 2019.
IAEA - INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. Lessons learned from accidental exposures in radiotherapy: Safety Reports Series No. 17. Viena, 2000.
IAEA, H. . Introduction of image guided radiotherapy into clinical practice / Internatio- nal: IAEA Human Health Reportas - 16. Vena: IAEA, 2019.
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. SETTING UP A RADIOTHERAPY PRO- GRAMME:: CLINICAL, MEDICAL PHYSICS, RADIATION PROTECTION AND SAFETY ASPECTS. VIENNA, 2008.
IWATA, H. et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: high local control with low toxicity. Neuro Oncol, v. 13, n. 8, p. 916 – 922, 08 2011.
JAFFRAY, D. A. Accurate accumulation of dose for improved understanding of radiation effects in normal tissue. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, p. 135 – 139, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi:org/10:1016/j:ijrobp:2009:06:093.
JI, T.; CONG, X. Spatial uncertainty of Elekta stereotactic cones in the treatment of multiple brain metastases using multiple cones. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, v. 15, n. 1, p. 100 – 103, Março 2022.
KAMER, J. B. van de et al. Process Management and Quality Assurance for Intracranial Stereotactic Treatment - Report 25 of the Netherlands Commission on Radiation Dosimetry. 2015. Digital.
KARELLAS, A. B.; THOMADSEN, B. R. Beam’s Eye View Imaging in Radiation Oncology. [S.l.]: , Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.
KARLSSON, B. et al. Calculation of isoeffective doses and the alpha/beta value by comparing results following radiosurgery and radiotherapy for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. J Neurosurg, v. 105, n. 1, p. 183 – 189, 12 2006.
KHAN, F. M. The physics of radiation therapy. 4th. ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010.
KILBY, W. et al. A technical overview of the Cyberknife System. In: KILBY, W. et al. (Ed.). Handbook of Robotic and Image-Guided Surgery. Elsevier Inc, 2020. cap. 2, p. 15 – 38. Disponível em: https://doi:org/10:1016/B978-0-12-814245-5:00002-5.
KIM, D. G.; LUNSFORD, L. D. Current and future management of brain metastasis. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. 1a. ed. [S.l.]: karger, 2012.
KIM, H. J. et al. Dosimetric effect of CT contrast agent in CyberKnife treatment plans. Radiation Oncology, 2013. Disponível em: https://ro-journal:biomedcentral:com/articles/ 10:1186/1748-717X-8-244.
KIM, T. H. et al. Development of an IAEA phase-space dataset for the Leksell Gamma Knife® T PerfexionTM using multi-threaded Geant4 simulations. Physica Medica 64 (2019) 222–229, v. 64, p. 222 – 229, July 2019.
KIRBY, M.; CALDER, K. On-Treatment Verification Imaging. [S.l.]: CRC Press, 2019. 266 p.
KIRKPATRICK, J. et al. Defining the optimal planning target volume in image-guided stereo- tactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: results of a randomized trial. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 91, n. 1, p. 100 – 108, 01 2015.
KLEIN, E. E. et al. Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators.
Medical Physics, v. 36, n. 9, p. 4196 – 4212, September 2009a.
KLEIN, E. E. et al. Task Group 142: Quality assurance of medical accelerators. Medical Physics, v. 36, n. 9, p. 4197 – 4212, September 2009b.
KONDZIOLKA, D. Functional radiosurgery. Neurosurgery, v. 44, n. 1, p. 12 – 20, 01 1999.
KONDZIOLKA, D. et al. Radiosurgery and radiotherapy: observations and clarifications. J Neurosurg, v. 101, n. 4, p. 585 – 589, 10 2004.
KRAUS, K. M.; KAMPFER, S.; WILKENS, J. Helical tomotherapy: Comparison of Hi-ART and Radixact clinical patient treatments at the Technical University of Munich. [S.l.], 2020.
KUTCHER, G. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 40. MEDICAL PHYSICS-LANCASTER, p. 581 –, 1994. Disponível em: https://pubmed:ncbi:nlm:nih:gov/8058027/.
KUTUK, T. et al. Dedicated isotropic 3-D T1 SPACE sequence imaging for radiosurgery planning improves brain metastases detection and reduces the risk of intracranial relapse. Radiother Oncol, v. 173, n. 2, p. 84 – 92, 08 2022.
L, F. et al. Conformity index: a review. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 64, p. 333 – 42, 1 2006.
LASAK, J. M.; GORECKI, J. P. The history of stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy.
Otolaryngologic clinics of North America, v. 42, n. 4, p. 593 – 599, 08 2009.
LATIFI, K. et al. Practical quantification of image registration accuracy following the AAPM TG-132 report framework. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v. 19, p. 125 – 133, 6 2018.
LAWRENCE, Y. R. et al. Radiation dose-volume effects in the brain. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 76, p. S20 – 7, 2 2010.
LEVEGRUN, S. et al. Radiation-induced changes of brain tissue after radiosurgery in patients with arteriovenous malformations: correlation with dose distribution parameters. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 59, p. 796 – 808, 6 2004.
LIAO, H. et al. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery using the Novalis system for the management of pituitary adenomas close to the optic apparatus. J Clin Neurosci, v. 21, n. 1, p. 111 – 115, 01 2014.
LIGHTSTONE, A. W. et al. Intracranial stereotactic positioning systems: Report of the american association of physicists in medicine radiation therapy committee task group no. 68. Medical Physics, v. 32, n. 7, p. 2380 – 2398, Julho 2005.
LINDVALL, P. et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in medium-sized to large arteriovenous malformations. J Clin Neurosci, v. 22, n. 6, p. 955 – 958, 06 2015.
LOMAX, N. J.; SCHEIB, S. G. Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 55, p. 1409 – 19, 3 2003.
LOZANO, A. M. et al. Gamma Knife: Technical Aspects. In: LOZANO, A. M. et al. (Ed.). Textbook of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. 2. ed. [S.l.]: Springer, 2009. v. 1. ISBN 978-3-540-69960-6.
LUH, J. Y. et al. ACR-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT). American journal of clinical oncology, v. 43, p. 459 – 468, 5 2020.
LUTZ, W.; WINSTON, K. R.; MALEKI, N. A system for stereotactic radiosurgey with a linear accelerator. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., v. 14, n. 2, p. 373 – 381, February 1998.
MACKIE, T. R. The history of Tomotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, v. 51, n. 13, p. 427 – 453, January 2006.
MANGER, R. P. et al. Failure mode and effects analysis and fault tree analysis of surface image guided cranial radiosurgery. Medical Physics, v. 42, n. 5, p. 2449 – 2461, May 2015.
MARINO, C. et al. Case Study - Treating Solitary Brain Metastases with RapidArc and MV-IGRT. [S.l.]: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2012.
MASI, L. et al. Cone Beam CT Image Guidance for Intracranial Stereotactic Treatments: Comparison With a Frame Guided Set-Up. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, v. 71, n. 3, p. 926 – 933, Julho 2008.
MASINI, L. et al. Application of failure mode and effects analysis to intracranial stereotactic radiation surgery by linear accelerator. Practical Radiation Oncology, v. 4, n. 6, p. 392 – 397, March 2014.
MCCULLOUGH, J. P. et al. AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 2.b.: Com-
missioning and quality assurance of X-ray-based image-guided radiotherapy systems. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(9):73–81., v. 22, n. 9, p. 73 – 81, 6 2021.
MCNAIR, H. A.; FRANKS, K. N.; HERK, M. V. On Target 2: Updated Guidance for Image- guided Radiotherapy. Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), v. 34, p. 187 – 188, 11 2021.
MENZEL, H. International commission on radiation units and measurements. Journal of the ICRU, p. 14 –, 02 2014. Disponível em: https://journals:sagepub:com/home/cru.
MEYER, J. L.; HINKELBEIN, W. IMRT, IGRT, SBRT – Advances in the Treatment Planning and Delivery of Radiotherapy. [S.l.]: KARGER, 2007. v. 40.
MINNITI, G.; OSTI, M. F.; NIYAZI, M. Target delineation and optimal radiosurgical dose for pituitary tumors. Radiat Oncol, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1 – 14, 10 2016.
MINNITI, G. et al. Frameless linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metasta- ses: analysis of patient repositioning using a mask fixation system and clinical outcomes. Radiation Oncology (London, England), BioMed Central, v. 6, p. 158 –, 2011. ISSN 1748-717X. Disponível em: https://www:ncbi:nlm:nih:gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253058/.
MORALES, J. E. ADVANCES IN VERY SMALL X-RAY FIELD DOSIMETRY FOR CIRCU- LAR CONES USED IN STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY. 2019. 163 p. Tese (Doutorado
em Filosofia).
MURPHY, M. J. et al. The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Task Group 75. Medical Physics, v. 34, n. 10, p. 4041 – 4063, September 2007.
MUTIC, S. et al. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed- tomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Commitee Task Group no.66. Medical Physics, v. 30, n. 10, p. 2762 – 2792, October 2003.
NASA OFFICE OF SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE. Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications. 1. ed. [S.l.: s.n.], 2002. v. 1. 218 p.
NATAF, F. et al. Radiosurgery with or without A 2-mm margin for 93 single brain metastases. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 70, n. 3, p. 766 – 772, 03 2008.
NOVOTNY, J. J. et al. Long-term stability of the leksell Gamma Knife® Perfexion(TM) patient positioning system (PPS). Medical Physics, v. 41, n. 3, p. 031711–1 – 031711–9, February 2014.
OLCH, A. J. et al. Dosimetric effects caused by couch tops and immobilization devices: report of AAPM Task Group 176. Medical physics, v. 41, p. 061501 –, 6 2014a.
OLCH, A. J. et al. Dosimetric effects caused by couch tops and immobilization devices: report of AAPM Task Group 176. Medical physics, v. 41, p. 061501 –, 6 2014b.
PADDICK, I. A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Technical note. Journal of neurosurgery, v. 93 Suppl 3, p. 219 – 22, 1 2001.
PADDICK, I.; LIPPITZ, B. A simple dose gradient measurement tool to complement the conformity index. Journal of neurosurgery, v. 105 Suppl, p. 194 – 201, 12 2006.
PALMANS, H. et al. Dosimetry of small static fields used in external photon beam radiothe- rapy: summary of TRS-483, the IAEA- AAPM international Code of Practice for reference and relative dose determination. Medical Physics, v. 45, n. 11, p. 1123 – 1145, September 2018.
PAPACONSTADOPOULOS, P. On the detector response and the reconstruction of the source intensity distribution in small photon fields. 2016. - p. Tese (PhD Tesis) — McGill University.
PAPANIKOLAOU, N. TISSUE INHOMOGENEITY CORRECTIONS FOR MEGAVOLTAGE
PHOTON BEAMS. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2004. Disponível em: www:aapm:orgâA˘ žpubsâA˘ žreportsâA˘ žrpt_85.
PAPANIKOLAOU, N. et al. TISSUE INHOMOGENEITY CORRECTIONS FOR MEGAVOL- TAGE PHOTON BEAMS. AAPM REPORT NO. 85, 08 2004.
PAPPAS, E. P. et al. On the development of a comprehensive MC simulation model for the Gamma Knife Perfexion radiosurgery unit. Phys. Med. Biol., n. 61, p. 1182 – 1203, January 2016.
PAULSON, E.; CRIJNS, S.; KELLER, B. Consensus opinion on MRI simulation for external beam radiation treatment planning. Radiother Oncol, v. 2, p. 187 – 192, 2 2016.
PAULSON, E. et al. Consensus opinion on MRI simulation for external beam radiation treatment planning. Radiotherapy and Oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, v. 121, n. 2, p. 187 – 192, Nov 2016.
PEREZ, C. A.; VIJAYAKUMAR, S. Technical basis of radiation therapy: Practical Clinical Applications. [S.l.]: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
PETTI et A. P. L. Recommendations on the practice of calibration, dosimetry, and quality assurance for gamma stereotactic radiosurgery: Report of AAPM Task Group 178. Medical physics. Disponível em: https://doi:org/10:1002/mp:14831.
PIEDADE, P. A.; L.A, R.; J.G.P, P. Volume-dose indexes and dose prescription descriptive review of radiosurgery planning. BRAZILIAN JOURNALOF RADIATION SCIENCES, v. 7, n. 3B, p. 01 – 06, 2019.
PODGORSAK, E. Radiation oncology physics: A Handbook for teachers and students. VIENA: IAEA, 2005.
POPPLE, R. et al. Transition From Manual to Automated Planning and Delivery of Volu- metric Modulated Arc Therapy Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Clinical, Dosimetric, and Quality Assurance Results. Practical radiation oncology, v. 11, p. e163 – e171, 2 2021.
PRADO, A. et al. Dosimetric characterization of a 5 mm diameter BrainLab cone for radi- osurgery. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express, v. 4, n. 4, p. 045042 – 045060, Julho 2018.
PUTZ, F. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for brain stereotactic radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol, v. 196, n. 1, p. 444 – 456, March 2020a.
PUTZ, F. et al. FSRT vs. SRS in Brain Metastases-Differences in Local Control and Radiation Necrosis-A Volumetric Study. Frontiers in Oncology, v. 10, n. 559193, 09 2020b.
RADIOLOGYINFO.ORG. Professions in Radiation Therapy. Disponível em: https:// www:radiologyinfo:org/en/info/professions-radiation-therapy. Acesso em: 22 de julho de 2022.
RAMAKRISHNA, N. et al. A clinical comparison of patient setup and intra-fraction motin using frame-based radiosurgery versus a frameless image-guided radiosurgery system for intracranial lesions. Radiotherapy and Oncology,, v. 95, p. 109 – 115, Avril 2010a.
RAMAKRISHNA, N. et al. A clinical comparison of patient setup and intra-fraction motin using frame-based radiosurgery versus a frameless image-guided radiosurgery system for intracranial lesions. Radiotherapy and Oncology,, v. 95, p. 109 – 115, Avril 2010b.
REICHERT, M. et al. Contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional SPACE versus MP-RAGE for the detection of brain metastases: considerations with a 32-channel head coil. Investigative radiology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 55 – 60, Jan 2013.
REYNOLDS, T. et al. Dose Gradient Index for Stereotactic Radiosurgery/Radiation Therapy. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 106, p. 604 – 611, 2 2020a.
REYNOLDS, T. A. et al. Dose Gradient Index for Stereotactic Radiosurgery/Radiation Therapy. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 106, p. 604 – 611, 2 2020b.
RICOTTONE, N. et al. HYPO-FRACTIONATED NON-INVASIVE TREATMENT OF A SO- LITARY BRAIN METASTASIS USING RAPIDARC AND A MEGAVOLTAGE (MV) BASED PATIENT POSITIONING TECHNIQUE. In: XXI CONGRESSO NAZIONALE AIRO. [S.l.: s.n.], 2011. p. 236 – 237.
ROPER, J. et al. Single-Isocenter Multiple-Target Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Risk of Com- promised Coverage. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 93, p. 540 – 6, 10 2015.
S, A. et al. COMPARISON OF MINIATURE MULTILEAF COLLIMATION (MMLC) WITH CIR- CULAR COLLIMATION FOR STEREOTACTIC TREATMENT. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys, v. 37, n. 3, p. 679 – 688, 03 1997. ISSN 0360-3016/97.
SALKELD, A. et al. Changes in Brain Metastasis During Radiosurgical Planning. Interna- tional journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 102, n. 4, p. 727 – 733, Nov 2018.
SALTER, B. J. et al. The talon removable head frame system for stereotactic radiosur- gery/radiotherapy: measurement of the repositioning accuracy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, v. 51, n. 2, p. 555 – 562, Outubro 2001.
SALVAJOLI, J. V.; SOUHAMI, L.; FARIA, S. L. Radioterapia em Oncologia. 2. ed. [S.l.]: Atheneu, 2013. 1312 p. ISBN 9788538803812.
SANTO, M. L. R. S. et al. Análise de riscos FMEA vs. SEVRRA em tratamentos radioterápi- cos com equipamentos de quilovoltagem. Brazilian Journal Of Radiation Sciences, v. 7, n. 3, p. 1 – 18, 2019.
SANTOS, J. D. L. et al. Image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technologies for radiation therapy localization and delivery. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 87, n. 1, p. 33 – 45, 09 2013.
SARAIVA, C. W. C. et al. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: Evaluation of planning using the sphericity degree of the target volume. PloS one, v. 15, p. e0225638 –, 1 2020.
SAW, C. B. et al. Clinical implementation of radiosurgery using the Helical TomoTherapy unit.
Medical Dosimetry, v. 43, n. 3, p. 284 – 290, January 2018.
SCHELL, M. et al. AAPM REPORT NO. 54 STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY: Re-
port of Task Group 42 Radiation Therapy Committee. [S.l.], 1995. Disponível em: https:
//www:aapm:org/pubs/reports/rpt_54:pdf.
SCHMITT, D. et al. Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy : Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol., v. 196, n. 5, p. 421 – 443, May 2020a.
SCHMITT, D. et al. Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy : Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol, v. 196, n. 5, p. 421 – 443, 05 2020b.
SCHMITT, D. et al. Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy. Strah- lenther Onkol, p. 421 – 443, 3 2020c.
SCHULLER, B. W.; HENDRICKSON, K. R. G.; RONG, Y. Medical physicists should meet with patients as part of the initial consult. J Appl Clin Med Phys, v. 19, n. 2, p. 6 – 9, 2018.
SEIBERT, T. M. et al. Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geome- tric miss in radiosurgery planning. Practical Radiation Oncology, v. 6, n. 6, p. 319 – 328, November 2016.
SELVAN, K. T. et al. Dosimetric Effect of Rotational Setup Errors in Single-Isocenter Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy of Multiple Brain Metastases. Journal of medical phy- sics, v. 44, p. 84 – 90, 7 2019.
SEUNTJENS, J. et al. ICRU report 91. Prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams. Journal of the ICRU, v. 14, n. 2, p. 1 – 160, 07 2014a.
SEUNTJENS, J. et al. ICRU report 91. Prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams. Journal of the ICRU, v. 14, n. 2, p. 1 – 160, 07 2014b.
SEUNTJENS, J.; VERHAEGEN, F. Comments on ‘Ionization chamber dosimetry of small photon fields: a Monte Carlo study on stopping-power ratios for radiosurgery and IMRT beams’. Physics in Medicine & Biology, v. 48, n. 21, p. L43 – –, Nov 2003.
SEYMOUR, Z. A. et al. Interval From Imaging to Treatment Delivery in the Radiation Surgery Age: How Long Is Too Long? International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 93, n. 1, p. 126 – 32, Sep 2015.
SHAW, E. et al. Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 47, p. 291 – 8, 5 2000a.
SHAW, E. et al. Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 47, p. 291 – 8, 5 2000b.
SHCULLER, B. W. et al. Failure mode and effects analysis: A community practice perspective.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, v. 18, n. 6, p. 258 – 267, August 2017.
SHEEHAN, J. P. et al. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the management of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a multicenter study. J Neurosurg, v. 119, n. 2, p. 446 – 456, 08 2013.
SHIBAMOTO, Y. et al. Influence of contrast materials on dose calculation in radiotherapy planning using computed tomography for tumors at various anatomical regions: a prospective study. Radiotherapy and Oncology, v. 84, p. 55 – 55, 2007. Disponível em: DOI:10:1016/ j:radonc:2007:05:015.
SHTRAUS, N. et al. Radiosurgical treatment planning of AVM following embolization with Onyx: possible dosage error in treatment planning can be averted. Journal of Neuro- Oncology, JUNHO 2010. Disponível em: https://pubmed:ncbi:nlm:nih:gov/20383557/.
SHUKAILI, K. A. et al. Characterization of ELEKTA SRS cone collimator using high spa- tial resolution monolithic silicon detector array. Journal of Applied to Cninical Medical Physics, v. 19, n. 4, p. 114 – 124, Julho 2018.
SOISSON, E.; MP, M.; WA, T. A comparison of helical tomotherapy to circular collimator- based linear-accelerator radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases. Am J Clin Oncol, v. 34, n. 4, p. 388 – 394, August 2011.
SOMIGLIANA, A. et al. How thick should CT/MR slices be to plan conformal radiotherapy? A study on the accuracy of three-dimensional volume reconstruction. Tumori, 1996. Disponível em: https://pubmed:ncbi:nlm:nih:gov/9063526/.
SRINIVASAN, K.; MOHAMMADI, M.; SHEPHERD, J. Investigation of effect of reconstruc- tion filters on cone-beam computed tomography image quality. Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine, v. 37, p. 607 – 14, 8 2014.
SRIVASTAVA, S. P.; C-W, C.; J, D. I. The effect of slice thickness on target and organs at risk volumes, dosimetric coverage and radiobiological impact in IMRT planning. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2016. Disponível em: https://pubmed:ncbi:nlm:nih:gov/26311077/.
STANHOPE, C. et al. Physics considerations for single-isocenter, volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple intracranial targets. Practical radiation oncology, v. 6, p. 207 – 213, 1 2016.
STANLEY, H. B. et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group
Medical physics, p. 4078 – 4101, 2010a. Disponível em: https://doi:org/10:1118/ 1:3438081.
STANLEY, H. B. et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group
Medical physics, p. 4078 – 4101, 2010b. Disponível em: https://doi:org/10:1118/ 1:3438081.
STANLEY, J. et al. Evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery conformity indices for 170 target volumes in patients with brain metastases. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v. 12, p. 3449 –, 5 2011.
STERN, R. L. Verification of monitor unit calculations for nonIMRT clinical radiotherapy: report of AAPM Task Group 114. Medical physics, p. 504 – 530, 2011. Disponível em: doi:org/10:1118/1:3521473:
SUMIDA, I. et al. Evaluation of imaging performance of megavoltage cone-bam CT over an extended period. Journal of Radiation Research, v. 55, p. 191 – 199, julho 2014.
TANAKA, Y. et al. Impact of patient positioning uncertainty in noncoplanar intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Journal of applied clinical medical physics, v. 21, p. 89 – 97, 1 2020.
TANEJA, S. et al. CBCT image quality QA: Establishing a quantitative program. Journal Applied Clinical Medical Physics, v. 21, n. 11, p. 215 – 225, 2020.
TANYI, J. A. et al. Impact of the high-definition multileaf collimator on linear accelerator-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. The British Journal of Radiology, v. 84, n. 1003, p. 629 – 638, Julho 2011.
TEIXEIRA, F. C.; ALMEIDA, C. E. de; HUQ, M. S. Failure mode and effects analysis based risk profile assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery programs at three cancer centers in Brazil. Medical Physics, v. 43, n. 1, p. 171 – 178, January 2016.
THOMAS, E. M. et al. Comparison of plan quality and delivery time between volumetric arc therapy (RapidArc) and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple cranial metastases. Neurosurgery, v. 75, p. 409–17; discussion 417–8 –, 5 2014.
TREUER, H. et al. Impact of target point deviations on control and complication probabilities in stereotactic radiosurgery of AVMs and metastases. Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, v. 81, p. 25 – 32, 9 2006.
TRIFILETTI, D. M. et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Comprehensive Guide. 1. ed. [S.l.]: Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019, 2019. 435 p. ISBN 978-3-030-16924-4.
TRYGEESTAD, E. et al. Inter- and Intrafraction Patient Positioning Uncertainties for Intracra- nial Radiotherapy: A Study of Four Frameless, Thermoplastic Mask-Based Immobilization Strategies Using Daily Cone-Beam CT. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, v. 80, n. 1, p. 281 – 290, Maio 2011.
TSAI, J.; MICAILY, B.; MIYAMOTO, C. Optimization and quality assurance of an image-guided radiation therapy system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy radiotherapy. Medical Dosimetry, v. 37, p. 321 – 333, 2012.
TULEASCA, C. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review.
Journal of neurosurgery, v. 130, p. 733 – 757, 4 2018.
VERGALASOVA, I. et al. Multi-Institutional Dosimetric Evaluation of Modern Day Stereo- tactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Treatment Options for Multiple Brain Metastases. Frontiers in oncology, v. 9, p. 483 –, 6 2019.
VERHEY, L. J.; SMITH, V.; SERAGO, C. F. Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on physical dose distributions. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, v. 40, p. 497 – 505, 2 1998.
WANG, C. et al. Prolonged Treatment Time Deteriorates Positioning Accuracy for Stereotactic Radiosurgery. PLoS One, v. 10, n. 4, p. e0123359, 2015., v. 10, n. 4, p. 1 – 10, Abril 2015.
WARNICK, R. E. et al. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to enhance the safety and efficiency of Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT, v. 7, p. 115 – 125, June 2020.
WIANT, D. B. et al. Commissioning and validation of BrainLAB cones for 6X FFF and 10X FFF beams on a Varian TrueBeam STx. Journal of Applied to Cninical Medical Physics, v. 14, n. 6, p. 293 – 306, Novembro 2013.
WU, A. et al. Physics of Gamma Knife approach on convergent beams in stereotactic radiosurgery. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Physics, v. 18, p. 941 – 949, 1990.
XU, A. Y. et al. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, v. 18, n. 6, p. 152 – 168, August 2017.
YIN, Z.; HUGTENBURG, R.; BEDDOE, A. Response corrections for solid-state detectors in megavoltage photon dosimetry. Physics in Medicine & Biology, v. 49, n. 16, p. 3691 – 3702, Aug 2004.
YOO, S. et al. A quality assurance program for the on-board imager®. Medical Physics, v. 33, p. 4431 – 4447, October 2006.
YOUNGE, K. C. et al. Practical Implementation of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for Safety and Efficiency in Stereotactic Radiosurgery. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1003 – 1008, 2015.
YU, C.; SHEPARD, D. Treatment Planning for Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Photon Beams.
Technology in CancerResearch&Treatment, v. 2, n. 2, p. 93 – 104, 04 2003. ISSN 1533-
YUAN, Y. et al. Evaluation of multiple factors affecting normal brain dose in single-isocenter multiple target radiosurgery. Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, v. 5, p. 131 – 144, 4 2018.
ZACH, L. et al. Delayed contrast extravasation MRI: a new paradigm in neuro-oncology.
Neuro-Oncology, v. 17, n. 3, p. 457 – 465, 01 2015.
ZEVERINO, M. et al. Comissioning of the Leksell Gamma Knife Icon. Medical Physics, v. 44, n. 2, p. 355 – 363, December 2016/10.
ZHANG, J. et al. Influence of Using a Contrast-Enhanced CT Image as the Primary Image on CyberKnife Brain Radiosurgery Treatment Plans. Frontiers in Oncology, 2021. Disponível em: https://pubmed:ncbi:nlm:nih:gov/34604041/.
ZHANG, M. et al. The Measurement Accuracy of Ball Bearing Center in Portal Images Using an Intensity-Weightd Centroid Method. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, v. 4, p. 273 – 283, November 2015.
ZHU, T. C.; SAINI, A. S. Diode dosimetry for megavoltage electron and photonbeams. In: ANAIS, 2009, Colorado Springs. AAPM Summer School. Colorado Springs, 2009. p. 913 – 939.
ZHUANG, T. et al. Quantitative Study of Geometrical Distortion in Cone-beam CT Images Reconstructed using FDK Algorithm T. Zhuang, H. Li, J. Bowsh. International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics, Julho 2009.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Diego da Cunha Silveira Alves Silva, Marília Lisboa de Oliveira, Crystian Willian Chagas Saraiva, Ana Cristina Bratkowski Leoni, Gustavo Ferraresi Tietz, João Paulo Silva Leite, Lucas Delbem Albino, William Correia Trinca, Allison Bruno Barcelos Borges, Ana Paula Vollet Cunha, Anselmo Mancini, Gabriela Reis dos Santos de Jesus, Jean Carlo Cadillo López, João Gabriel Ribeiro Gomes, Marília Becker Lima, Thiago Schmeling Fontana
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A submissão de artigos originais para a Revista Brasileira de Física Médica implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação impressa e digital. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Em virtude de sermos um periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais, científicas, não comerciais, desde que citada a fonte.
A Revista Brasileira de Física Médica está sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
